The copper price forecast for 2026 is not one number. It is two very different numbers, and the gap between them is more useful to an investor than either forecast alone: even the banks that move billions of dollars into copper cannot agree on where the price goes next.

What the major banks are forecasting for copper in 2026

Start with what has changed. In June 2026, Goldman Sachs raised its end-2026 copper price target to US$13,735 per tonne, up from US$12,465 per tonne, as supply disruptions in Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo tightened the market more than the bank had expected (GuruFocus, 1 June 2026). A month later, J.P. Morgan Global Research’s Mid-Year Outlook went further, targeting US$14,800 per tonne by December 2026, with the bank’s Head of Base and Precious Metals Strategy, Greg Shearer, flagging potential upside toward US$15,000 per tonne if US tariff settings keep pulling copper into American warehouses (J.P. Morgan Global Research, 1 July 2026).

Both moves point the same direction, and it is a different direction from where 2026 started: tighter supply, not softer demand, is now driving the number higher.

Where the banks agree, and where it counts more for a development-stage project than the headline number does, is the decade ahead: both expect the structural gap between copper supply and demand to widen, not narrow. S&P Global’s research adds detail to that demand side, reinforcing the growth and shortfall figures set out above.

See our long-term copper investment case for how to weigh a moving near-term price forecast against a structural demand trend.

Why copper demand is structural, not cyclical

A one-year price forecast is a useful signal, but the more important question is whether the demand behind it is temporary or structural. On that question the banks and research houses line up with unusual consistency.

Electric vehicles are one driver. Wood Mackenzie expects copper demand from EVs to double by 2035.

AI data centres are a newer, faster-moving driver. BHP’s Economic and Commodity Outlook expects copper demand from data centres to grow sixfold, to nearly 3 million tonnes a year by 2050, as AI infrastructure expands. Wood Mackenzie puts a nearer-term number on the grid side of that same trend: roughly 1.1 million tonnes of copper needed for data centre grid infrastructure alone by 2030.

Grid modernisation is the third leg. Wood Mackenzie expects copper demand tied to grid upgrades, transmission, and renewable capacity to rise from 1.7 million tonnes today to 4.3 million tonnes by 2035, around 10% annual growth.

None of these three drivers is contracted to the copper price. They are contracted to build-out schedules already underway: EV production lines, data centre construction, and grid upgrades governments and utilities have already funded. That is why this demand is structural, not cyclical, and does not disappear if the price dips for a quarter or two the way more discretionary industrial demand can.

See why copper demand is rising in our companion guide to the long-term investment case.

The supply deficit: where is it coming from?

If demand is structural, the supply side is where the real uncertainty sits, and it is not really in dispute that new copper supply is struggling to keep up. The disagreement is about how large the gap gets and how fast.

A new mine takes 15 to 17 years on average from discovery to first production, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence mine lead time data. Copper that closes a 2030 demand gap has to come from a project already in development today.

The size of the gap varies by source. S&P Global puts a potential shortfall at 10 million tonnes by 2040, while BHP’s own outlook says the market needs 10 million tonnes of new supply by 2035 just to stay in balance. Wood Mackenzie adds: the industry needs roughly 8 million tonnes of new mine capacity and 3.5 million tonnes of additional scrap supply by 2035 to keep pace.

What is not in dispute is the direction. Every institution cited here, banks and research houses alike, expects supply to lag demand through the back half of this decade. The disagreement is over magnitude and timing, not existence.

What higher copper prices mean for junior copper explorers

This is where the macro forecast connects to something more concrete, and to why investors are drawn to copper in the first place: what a wider gap between copper supply and demand does to the economics of a project that has not been built yet.

A junior copper explorer at the development stage carries fixed costs that do not move with the copper price: drilling, feasibility studies, permitting, and plant capital are largely locked in once a project reaches that stage. What does move is the revenue side. A higher realised copper price improves the net present value of a fixed ore body without the company doing anything differently, and can make the same project easier to finance. Pre-production projects are more sensitive to the copper price than an established producer, with no existing production stream to smooth the swings.

In April 2026, QIC’s Critical Minerals and Battery Technology Fund committed $15 million to QMines (ASX:QML), structured as a $5 million equity investment and a $10 million royalty over Mt Chalmers, making the project’s Definitive Feasibility Study fully funded, a real-world sign of how the junior-explorer thesis is landing with sophisticated capital.

In July 2026, Queensland Government and QIC representatives, led by the Hon. Ros Bates MP, visited Mt Chalmers to inspect progress, a government-backing signal alongside the institutional one.

None of this is a forecast of what QML shares will do. It describes how development-stage project economics respond to the macro backdrop above, using our Mt Chalmers copper-gold project in central Queensland, now advancing through a fully funded DFS, as the worked example.

ASX copper stocks and the 2026 forecast

The ASX gives investors access to copper at very different points on the risk curve. Large-cap producers such as BHP hold copper alongside iron ore, coal, and other commodities, diluting pure copper exposure but adding liquidity and dividend income. Copper-focused ETFs track the commodity price directly without single-company risk. Junior explorers sit at the other end: concentrated, pre-production, and structurally more leveraged to a copper price move because there is no existing production to average the swings out.

That leverage cuts both ways. Any investor weighing this copper price forecast for 2026 against the ASX copper universe should size a position with that in mind. See our complete guide to ASX copper stocks for how producers, mid-caps, and juniors compare, or our guide to copper mining in Queensland for the regional operating context behind projects like Mt Chalmers.

Frequently Asked Questions